How will the Russian army respond to the U.S.-made rocket launchers in Ukraine?

How will the Russian army respond to the U.S.-made rocket launchers in Ukraine? https://whatchinareads.com/article/?uid=e054c884f3dc11ec9897c7030b3aab5e

2022-06-24: [Article Link]  As at 22 February, Russia had destroyed a total of 594 multiple-barrelled rockets, 53 of which were destroyed by the Russian Army on that day, accounting for about 8 per cent of all destroyed ULU rockets, the largest result of the destruction of ULU rockets since the beginning of the war. According to Russia’s published war papers, Ukraine does have military power, and it is no wonder that not a few days after the war Ukraine called it the third-largest military power in the world. Now, the army is cold-handed and hot-headed, with no use for new weapons, and is being beaten everywhere. It's getting worse and worse, and that's the price of turning to the West. Ukrainian soldiers are also tough enough not to fear death, not to know to die, not to fight. One day, 30 per cent of those who have been wiped out will surrender their weapons and will be free of life. The decisive factor in war is the human being, so the goal is to eliminate the forces of the enemy. Otherwise, Ukraine’s foreign-aided weapons will only increase and become more sophisticated, as demonstrated by Russia’s strategic failure. Russia-Ukraine, if united, can join forces against British-American NATO. But it is uncontroversial, and it has to be reversed to the West. Previously, Biden had publicly rejected the request of Zelensky M270, this time giving a lighter quantification of M142 “Haimas” multi-barrel rocket system with better mobility, with the first equipment known to have arrived in Ukraine. It's good for Ukraine, it's a powerful range, it's good for mobility, it's good for ploughing, it's good for M142. Russia must take advantage of its air advantage, destroy this thing, use tornadoes with Haimas, at great cost. This time, Russia destroyed more than 50 rockets, an estimated portion of the M142 rockets. Haimas was a bit of an exaggeration when he was so powerful. There are many ways to deal with such weapons, and the more powerful they are, the more demanding they are on the logistics supply chain. Russia can wipe out all of Kiev’s several fuel storage bases in the east. Together with the fact that rockets must have storage bases, and not far from the battlefield, they can easily be destroyed by the discovery of satellites and drones. Airborne troops and unmanned aerial vehicles can move vehicles. Finally, the maintenance base, where sophisticated weapons require regular maintenance and inspection, can strike even if Haimas is moving. As a result, modern warfare is based mainly on systemic warfare, and on one or two sophisticated weapons alone, there is no military advantage. Ukraine’s desire to change the situation on the battlefield through Western military aid can only be described as a lie.