Hong Xiuzhu went to the mainland to shout "conspiracy to reunify" Zhu Lilun returned like this (Photo) Cross-strait
2022-05-16: [Article Link]
The former president of the Kuomintang Party, Hung Soo-jung, recently travelled to Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, to participate in the “Youth Development Forum across the Straits” (photo: video screenshot from Weibo) to see the Chinese website, which prohibits the creation of mirror sites. Return to the Chinese website.
[See China's 16 May 2022 message] (see Chinese journalist Li Jiaqi for a comprehensive report) former Chairman of the Kuomintang Party, Hong Su-jung, who recently received a visit from the Chinese media, claimed that the core meaning of the 92nd Consensus was to adhere to the one-China principle and that the two sides were conspiring to reunify in the future. In this regard, the 15th day of the Land Commission of the Republic of China stressed that Beijing's long-held exchange campaign, which is based on propaganda that is not in keeping with the expectations of the public in Taiwan and the political claims of Taiwan, “we believe that it is meaningless and futile”. Look at the Chinese website and ban the creation of mirror sites. Go back to the original Chinese site. The former President of the National Party (Kuomintang), Hung Su-jung, recently travelled to Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, to participate in the Cross-Strait Youth Development Forum and to lead the group to pay tribute to the Yuan army, Secretary of Zhejiang Province. Last week, during a visit to the Cross-Strait Headlines, Hung Xiu-jeong declared that the 92nd Consensus had two central meanings: adherence to the one-China principle, and complicity between the two sides in the future reunification of the motherland. In addition, the Yuan army, the secretary-general of Zhejiang province, has recently met with Hung Su-juan in Hangzhou, who greatly appreciates his political attitude toward Hong. Hung Shu-jian said to Yuan that there is no wind or rain on either side of the border that would prevent civil exchanges between the two sides, and that she will continue to promote exchanges of cooperation between the two sides, particularly between youths on both sides. According to the Freedom Times, in response to the comments made by Hong Xiuju, the DPP Executive Committee, Zhang Liao Wanjing, stated that the “92nd Consensus” and “peaceful reunification” advocated by Hong Xiuju was not the main popular opinion in Taiwan, and that Hong Xiu Jing wanted reunification, which was her freedom, but whether to go to China to work as a catalyst was contrary to the relevant legal provisions of the Republic of China must be subject to external scrutiny. Zhang Liao Jin criticises that Hung Su-jung, who was president of the Kuomintang National Party, has become a fighter for the red China, harming national sovereignty and democratic freedoms, espoused the one-China principle and united under the communist totalitarian China, which is unacceptable to democratic nations around the world, let alone convince the people of Taiwan. The Communist Party of the Lao People's Democratic Republic is intent on destroying Taiwan's society.
According to three news reports, Taiwan's Deputy Director of Ki-jin's Information Department, Chen Zi-Yu, has criticized Hong Su-jung for his active cooperation with China's activities in recent years and has become a model for the battle. “Such actions do not only represent the mainstream opinion in Taiwan, but also highlight the self-defeating nature of some members of the Kuomintang party. He further questioned whether it was the position of the Kuimintang party, or whether it was the Kuimintang party's current policy towards Beijing, and whether “the leader of the Kuomintang party, Zhu Liliun, had to come forward and make it clear. Zhu Lilun, for his part, did not respond positively to the controversy, but merely said that cross-Straits exchanges were good, that he advocated exchanges based on the party charters and platforms of the Kuomintang party, and that he wanted dialogue between the two sides rather than confrontation.
On 15th, the CLC stated that, through the exchanges it has led for a long time, it has promoted political ideas that are not in keeping with the expectations of the people of Taiwan and that reduce Taiwan's political aspirations, “we believe that they are meaningless and futile”. The people of Taiwan and the international community do not agree with what the Beijing authorities termed the “nine-two consensus” “one-size-fits-all principle, one-on-one and one-on-one” and the lack of affiliation between the two sides is the objective status quo and the reality. The Commission stated that the current threat to the political and military forces of Taiwan by the Communist Party of China, with the intention of splitting down the negative measures that undermine the democratic society of Taiwan, has provoked resentment on the part of the people of Taiwan and further jeopardizes peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait. “We believe that the Beijing authorities are deliberately acting against the virtuous interaction between the two sides of the Taiwan Straits”.
The Commission stressed that it is the established policy of the Government to promote normal and healthy exchanges of mutual dignity between the two sides of the Taiwan Straits, in keeping with the norms and without any political preconditions. By bringing together people from all walks of life in Taiwan, the Chinese Communist Party seeks to advance its political designs for reunification. Those who call upon all sides of Taiwan to participate in the activities in question should abide by the relevant norms of cross-Straits exchanges and should refrain from cooperating with the Communist Party of China in its battle against Taiwan, and jointly defend the sovereign security of States, democratic freedoms and the interests of Taiwan as a whole. It recalled that participants should not participate in any form in Chinese initiatives or promote activities involving “democratic consultation” and “one country, two systems” and that, in the event of a violation of an order, the competent authorities would deal with the matter in accordance with the law.
This paper has a short address: all copyrights, any form of reproduction is subject to permission from China, and it is forbidden to create mirror sites.
The stream of [honored members] can come together into the sea, and Son can make love. We ask for thousands of honorary members from all over the world: every honorary member who pays a subscription every year to become an honorary member of the China Watch website can help us break through the censorship and blockade, give at least 10,000 Chinese compatriots a true message of independence, give them early warning in times of distress, and save them from the plague and other social distress.